On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:05 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Mar 20, Scott James Remnant sc...@canonical.com wrote:
Doesn't Debian run depmod in the postinst of the kernel package - and
iirc, again on boot anyway?
Not anymore on boot, but I can't see why depmod should NOT being run
when the
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 21:13 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
[ adding jcm and lkml to Cc: ]
[ You want linux-modu...@vger.kernel.org rather than LKML. I've added
the former to the CC list, we can kill LKML off the CC shortly. ]
That would mean that m-i-t has created a backwards incompatibility
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 21:57 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
Because the old modprobe does not understand the new relative (or rather
rootless) paths, aggravated by the fact that initramfs-tools does not
error out or display errors from modprobe (probably for good historic
reasons), I suddenly had
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 23:09 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 19 March 2009, Jon Masters wrote:
Yes, it was a bad idea of
mine (perhaps) to change the existing file format and I've learned
something, but it should only have affected for example that 3.4
release you're using.
Do you
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 23:58 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
I guess it's called progress ;) Sarcasm aside, if you can give me an
example of an actual real life set of users who are adversely affected
then I'll try to do something to help out. But if you're asking for old
versions of software to
5 matches
Mail list logo
