Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-05-01 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 03:50:37PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 20:48 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: Twas brillig at 14:41:10 07.03.2010 UTC+00 when t...@cyrius.com did gyre and gimble: Just tested it. Works fine here (mDNS resolves without promisc mode on

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-05-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 23:13 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 03:50:37PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 20:48 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: Twas brillig at 14:41:10 07.03.2010 UTC+00 when t...@cyrius.com did gyre and gimble: Just tested

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-03-07 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 02:30:22 15.02.2010 UTC+01 when j...@inutil.org did gyre and gimble: Jon, Sjoerg, Mikhail, Wouter: can one of you please test this kernel to see if it works on the N2100: http://merkel.debian.org/~tbm/tmp/kernel/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-iop32x_2.6.32-4_armel.deb MM Did

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-03-07 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 14:41:10 07.03.2010 UTC+00 when t...@cyrius.com did gyre and gimble: Just tested it. Works fine here (mDNS resolves without promisc mode on interface), thanks. MM Good to hear! That patch also included some debugging output. Can MM you please send the output from dmesg?

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-03-07 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Mikhail Gusarov dotted...@dottedmag.net [2010-03-07 20:18]: Just tested it. Works fine here (mDNS resolves without promisc mode on interface), thanks. Good to hear! That patch also included some debugging output. Can you please send the output from dmesg? Thanks. -- Martin Michlmayr

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-03-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 20:48 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: Twas brillig at 14:41:10 07.03.2010 UTC+00 when t...@cyrius.com did gyre and gimble: Just tested it. Works fine here (mDNS resolves without promisc mode on interface), thanks. MM Good to hear! That patch also included some

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-02-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Mikhail Gusarov dotted...@dottedmag.net [2010-02-15 08:33]: MM Did anyone test the kernel build? Sorry, don't have serial attached to recover in case of problems. Is it enough to unpack the kernel and modules and load it using kexec? I've never tried kexec. If it works, then sure. --

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-02-14 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:30:57PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Jon, Sjoerg, Mikhail, Wouter: can one of you please test this kernel to see if it works on the N2100: http://merkel.debian.org/~tbm/tmp/kernel/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-iop32x_2.6.32-4_armel.deb Did anyone test the kernel build?

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-02-14 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 02:30:22 15.02.2010 UTC+01 when j...@inutil.org did gyre and gimble: Jon, Sjoerg, Mikhail, Wouter: can one of you please test this kernel to see if it works on the N2100: http://merkel.debian.org/~tbm/tmp/kernel/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-iop32x_2.6.32-4_armel.deb MM Did

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2010-01-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Jon, Sjoerg, Mikhail, Wouter: can one of you please test this kernel to see if it works on the N2100: http://merkel.debian.org/~tbm/tmp/kernel/linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-iop32x_2.6.32-4_armel.deb * Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2009-10-16 04:27]: I'd like to get this bug fixed in some way

Bug#407217: Multicast broken in r8169 for one version of Thecus N2100

2009-10-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
I'd like to get this bug fixed in some way for the N2100, either by setting all bits in the multicast hash for this specific hardware (assuming we can detect it programmatically) or by adjusting the way we generate the multicast hash. Vince, do you have a test for this specific hardware? I know