Re: sid abi changes

2010-03-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 19:32 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump? Hi maks, Looks like you did this bump in r15232 and removed debian/abi/2.6.32-2 but didn't add debian/abi/2.6.32-3 --

Re: sid abi changes

2010-02-19 Thread Bastian Blank
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump? Yes. Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: sid abi changes

2010-02-19 Thread maximilian attems
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump? Yes. and why? please add reason, latest is

Re: sid abi changes

2010-02-19 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 23:45 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote: just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by a long mess (see below). anyone