On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 19:32 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by
a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump?
Hi maks,
Looks like you did this bump in r15232 and removed debian/abi/2.6.32-2
but didn't add debian/abi/2.6.32-3 --
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by
a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump?
Yes.
Bastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by
a long mess (see below). anyone against abi bump?
Yes.
and why?
please add reason, latest is
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 23:45 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:35:51PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:37PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
just tested latest sid with upcoming 2.6.32.9 and got greeted by
a long mess (see below). anyone
4 matches
Mail list logo