Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want, I can handle the translation update round, as it involves
grabbing PO files from kdm or xdm and use them in slim.
Please do. I'm confused about what happens next, why there is
untranslateable material in the call, exactly which bits
Please do. I'm confused about what happens next, why there is
untranslateable material in the call, exactly which bits that was and
so on and so forth. I suspect I'm too forgetful to be a useful reviewer.
Well, that specific review is not particularly simple because of the
close interaction
Justin B Rye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the default x-display-manager launched on boot; that is, the
option the system uses in the absence of any instructions to the
contrary (in this case I suppose via update-rc.d or something).
This is in line with how the word default is used in contexts
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MJ Ray wrote:
Also, looking at the archives now I'm not on a train, xdm seems to
have gone straight from Intent To Review to Last Call For Comments
in March 2007 - when was the Request For Review?
the templates trhat have been proofread are
I didn't proof-read the kdm templates because I don't care about kdm,
Well, I don't care about 90% of packages I review here, you know..:)
bugs in all other display managers. Please can shared templates be
announced in the subject line in future?
I will. Please forgive me in advance if I
Quoting MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What check for a default display manager? This check or another check?
The templates file should be identical to the xdm|kdm|gdm templates
file.
See attached proposed file...taken from xdm. It has already been
reviewed, so the maintainer *must* use that
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
What check for a default display manager? This check or another check?
The templates file should be identical to the xdm|kdm|gdm templates
file.
See attached proposed file...taken from xdm. It has already been
MJ Ray wrote:
So xdm's template (and any others copied) still has two bugs:
1. this is not selecting which one runs by default is it? It seems
like it's selecting which one is the first choice. The one that runs
by default is the fall-back, the last choice, which I suspect is
Justin B Rye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Each x-display-manager postinstall changes the default
x-display-manager by overwriting /etc/X11/default-display-manager in
a sort of annoying reinvention of the alternatives system.
When is this called? As the system's first choice or last choice or
Also, looking at the archives now I'm not on a train, xdm seems to
have gone straight from Intent To Review to Last Call For Comments
in March 2007 - when was the Request For Review?
the templates trhat have been proofread are indeed kdm
templates...where the process has been followed.
Given
10 matches
Mail list logo
