From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute, this software and its
documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee
...
and that no fee is charged for further
distribution of this software, or any modifications thereof.
Agreed, it's not
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Sascha Schumann wrote:
There are some concerns expressed in the slashdot discussion
forum about the new license scheme.
One AC writes
---
I'm using PHP3 (and liking it very much), and some of the new
PHP4
Btw I have another concern with the PHP4 licence itself:
4. The PHP Group reserves the right to modify the PHP license at
any time and without prior notice, as long as the changes keep
the free and open source nature of PHP.
does this mean rectroactively changing the
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
That means that it won't be possible to include PHP4 in linux
distributions, like Debian. Or at least, not linked against gdbm. Actually
that isn't that bad, I wanted to get rid of this gdbm dependency in the
.debs for quite a while since it is
The KDE licence will be compatible with QPL AFAIK (Knghtbrd worked a lot
on this with the KDE guys, hey, help us here, too :)). That doesn't make
the QPL compatible with the GPL of gdbm.
The QPL and the GPL will never be compatible. I don't really care though.
We don't distribute any GPL'ed
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
The KDE licence will be compatible with QPL AFAIK (Knghtbrd worked a lot
on this with the KDE guys, hey, help us here, too :)). That doesn't make
the QPL compatible with the GPL of gdbm.
The QPL and the GPL will never be compatible. I don't
At 07:38 PM 7/20/99 +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 05:37 PM 7/20/99 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
There are some concerns expressed in the slashdot discussion
forum about the new license scheme.
One AC writes
Netscape uses better wording.
6.1. New Versions.
Netscape Communications Corporation (``Netscape'') may publish revised
and/or new versions of the License from time to time. Each version will
be given a distinguishing version number.
6.2. Effect of New Versions.
VERY well done, Bruce :)
*applause*
On 20 Jul 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Netscape uses better wording.
6.1. New Versions.
Netscape Communications Corporation (``Netscape'') may publish revised
and/or new versions of the License from time to time. Each version will
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 07:38 PM 7/20/99 +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 05:37 PM 7/20/99 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
There are some concerns expressed in the slashdot discussion
forum about the new license scheme.
At 09:58 PM 7/20/99 +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
I've never said that anything you distribute with PHP4 is problematic due
to copyrights and licenses. I'm just saying that this license of PHP4
unfortunatelly prevents wider full-featured software distribution, like
Debian :(
I think you're
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 09:58 PM 7/20/99 +0200, Gergely Madarasz wrote:
I've never said that anything you distribute with PHP4 is problematic due
to copyrights and licenses. I'm just saying that this license of PHP4
unfortunatelly prevents wider full-featured software
From: Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What you're saying is that you may not use GPL'd software in conjunction
with non GPL software, from a user's standpoint. That's completely
absurd in my opinion.
Fixing your license language to be OSD-compliant is a much simpler issue
than
13 matches
Mail list logo
