Wichert Akkerman writes:
Previously Ben Pfaff wrote:
The TSS encryption algorithm implementation in tss.c is copyright Timo
Rinne and Cirion Oy. It is used with permission, and permission has
been given for anyone to use it for any purpose as part of ssh.
This violates the
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 11:18:03PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Ben Pfaff wrote:
The TSS encryption algorithm implementation in tss.c is copyright Timo
Rinne and Cirion Oy. It is used with permission, and permission has
been given for anyone to use it for any
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 03:48:51PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
What do people think of the following licence? I think there are tons of
problems, and I'd like a laundry-list of them to bring to the author's
attention.
There's a few issues with this license that I
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
If we disqualify breaking the law as a field of endeavor, this provision
still violates the DFSG. Remember, what's called breaking the law where I
live (selling marijuana, prostitution) might be called making a living
somewhere else.
The license only speaks about
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 07:06:45PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
If we disqualify breaking the law as a field of endeavor, this provision
still violates the DFSG. Remember, what's called breaking the law where I
live (selling marijuana, prostitution) might be called making
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 07:06:45PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
If we disqualify breaking the law as a field of endeavor, this provision
still violates the DFSG. Remember, what's called breaking the law where I
live (selling marijuana, prostitution) might be called making
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 12:18:25AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
Does the GPL allow redistribution of deriviate works under
a license with a rename if certain changes are made clause?
The GPL requires that you include prominent notices stating that you
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
quote
1) Any use of analog which is illegal under international or local law is
forbidden by this licence. Any such action is the sole responsibility of
the person committing the action.
[Some jurisdictions regulate the collection and processing
On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
Brian Ristuccia wrote:
5. The documentation is completely and totally non-free
Nod. Do you think removing the documentation from the package constitutes
modifying it, and would violate the license?
Removing the documentation would violate this:
9 matches
Mail list logo
