Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-19 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Nov 18, Joey Hess wrote: I still think mutt belongs in non-US. Why are people so opposed to putting it there? Putting a program like this in non-US just points out that the US government's laws are so brain-dead that they consider a mail reader a munition, thus raising public awareness of

Re: GPL source vs. binary

1999-11-19 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 03:10:04PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: Does a source that's licensed under the GPL automaticly produce a binary that can only be licensed under the GPL? Yes. Unless you're the Copyright holder, in which case (as you'd expect) all bets are off and you can do whatever

Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-19 Thread Seth David Schoen
Brian Ristuccia writes: On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 11:31:19AM -0800, Seth David Schoen wrote: Brian Ristuccia writes: Wouldn't seizing said machines violate the electronic communication privacy act or something similar by interefering with email on those machines as well? The

Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-19 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 14:36:56 -0800, Joey Hess wrote: The Debian mutt package also continues to ignore the wishes of mutt's upstream authors, who do belive mutt contains crypto hooks, and who only make the version available from outside the US for that reason. Mutt's current primary

Glide3 license

1999-11-19 Thread Joseph Carter
This may not matter much in the immediate future becuase Glide3 is completely tied in with XFree4 and we have no plans to include the beta versions of XFree3.9 in potato, however I figure now is the best time to bring this up--sooner the better. The recent source release for the Voodoo3 cards