On 24 May 2001, James LewisMoss wrote:
Please cc me on any replies. I'm not currently subscribed to this
list.
I've got three send back changes clauses. Comments on whether they
are free?
All three sound DFSG free, since you use the weasel words best efforts.
The big issue that I've seen
; 2. Users of this software agree to make their best efforts (a) to
; return to me any improvements or extensions that they make, so that
; these may be included in future releases; and (b) to inform me of
; noteworthy uses of this software.
The B section here really is outside the bounds
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Walter Landry wrote:
; 2. Users of this software agree to make their best efforts (a) to
; return to me any improvements or extensions that they make, so that
; these may be included in future releases; and (b) to inform me of
; noteworthy uses of this software.
The B
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 06:55:54PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
You're right, though in context, classification is enough to foil best
effort. Basically, the weasel words come to the rescue again.
As one counterexample, decisions in shareholder lawsuits have interpreted
the terms best effort and
4 matches
Mail list logo
