On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:24:27 -0700, NIC Technology Support wrote:
Below is a response to your case number CS3271 submitted to Broadcom
NIC Technology Support.
Case Title: GPLed driver and binary-only firmware blobs.
Can't draw a straight line? Well...now you can!
http://chien.jqny40jcybj8ykj.haetndhaet9.com
Conversation is food for the soul.
Frailty, thy name is woman!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
De: Steve Langasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The phrase For an executable work, complete source code means all
the source code for all modules it contains appears in the text
of GPL section *3*, which is not specific to works based on the
Program. Such lack of attention to license detail from
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:03 +0900, Horms wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 11:24:27 -0700, NIC Technology Support wrote:
Below is a response to your case number CS3271 submitted to Broadcom
NIC Technology Support.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 01:38:24PM -0400, astronut wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Jeff King wrote:
The latter message is from me. I am looking for such a license, as I am
trying to avoid ridiculous license propagation. My ideal license would
M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
astronut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am probably wrong here, since I joined the list in the middle of the
discussion, but can't you just put a notice at the top of the code like
this?
/* This code was written by name and is hereby released into the
public domain
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 07:57:47PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
What's the public domain in the context of UK / European law?
I don't know, as I am neither a lawyer nor a European. However, I assume
there is some concept of a work which has passed out of copyright (due
to time limitations).
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:24:51PM +0200, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
The Netherlands is one. Well, we do have a public domain, but it
only contains works that by law have no copyright and works whose
copyright has expired.
So what's wrong with a license like:
You may do anything with this
You might also observe the comments at
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=6924 and
http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=8508 regarding MySQL's retreat, first
from providing OpenSSL-enabled binaries, and then from referencing
OpenSSL in the server source code. Any bets on whether there was a
quid pro
On 6/6/05, Gervase Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The implementation of SSL in the Netscape NSS libraries is available
under the GPL, and I believe certain versions of it have FIPS validation.
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/fips/
I'm delighted to hear that. It does not
On 6/6/05, Michael K. Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. S. If you think that an FSF vendetta against OpenSSL would be an
anomaly, or that RMS is purist about copyright law when it comes to
his own conduct, you might be interested in Theo de Raadt's comments
at
11 matches
Mail list logo
