ATTENTION - Immediate Action Required
This is your Third and Final Notification, there now are two potential deals
for your review.
Please note that past credit history is a non-factor as long as you (or your
spouse) are still employed.
Verify your information with our secure form to ensure
We are working for a finger print validation system.
We want to work on the work done by NIST.
But we need bmp/jpeg/ppm/pmp to wsq/nist2000 file format changer.
We want to use cwsq,mindtct,bozoth3 program and working to make a gui.
any help will be boosting for us..
we are hanging this point.
Le Mardi 21 Juin 2005 18:10, Robert Jordens a écrit :
severity 309257 grave
tags 309257 - wontfix
tags 309257 + sid etch
thanks
You should not remove wontfix tag, it's maintainer role to decide if he will
fix the bug or not.
Hey!
* Florent Bayle:
severity 309257 important
tags
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 08:03:48PM +0200, Florent Bayle wrote:
Le Mardi 21 Juin 2005 18:10, Robert Jordens a écrit :
severity 309257 grave
tags 309257 - wontfix
tags 309257 + sid etch
thanks
You should not remove wontfix tag, it's maintainer role to decide if he will
fix the bug or
Le Mercredi 22 Juin 2005 02:38, Steve Langasek a écrit :
[...]
You should not remove wontfix tag, it's maintainer role to decide if he
will fix the bug or not.
The wontfix tag isn't really appropriate for an RC bug, however -- either
it gets fixed, or the package gets removed.
Yes, but I
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still protect source-code redistribution on line. Basically, I'm
trying to write a special exception to the GNU GPL that would add this
without some
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 19:05 -0700, Gregor Richards wrote:
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still protect source-code redistribution on line. Basically, I'm
trying to write a
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:52:55 +, Brian M. Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 19:05 -0700, Gregor Richards wrote:
Because the AGPL has some implementation issues that make it possibly
incompatible with the DFSG, I've been trying to find an alternative that
would still
The senior patent holder is presumably now Ford Oxaal, who discusses
his licensing policy, his relationship to iPIX, and the status of
Helmut Dersch's PT toolset at
http://www.pictosphere.com/kwx/faq.html .
I have made no attempt to evaluate the strength of his patents in
light of the prior art,
9 matches
Mail list logo
