Quoth the changelog for bsdiff 4.2-1:
bsdiff (4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial Release (Closes: #310736).
* Added text from website into README.
^^^
The text from my website appears as part of bsdiff_4.2-1.diff.gz.
My website, as an original
Scripsit Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The text from my website appears as part of bsdiff_4.2-1.diff.gz.
My website, as an original creative work, is covered by copyright
laws and treaties. I did not give permission for my website to be
copied and redistributed.
Have your spoken to the
Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The text from my website appears as part of bsdiff_4.2-1.diff.gz.
My website, as an original creative work, is covered by copyright
laws and treaties. I did not give permission for my website to be
copied and redistributed.
Colin Percival said on Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 11:00:47PM -0700,:
* Added text from website into README.
^^^
The text from my website appears as part of bsdiff_4.2-1.diff.gz.
My website, as an original creative work, is covered by copyright
laws
Mahesh T. Pai said on Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:30:01PM +0530,:
I am filing a bug...
No. 322147 with a patch
:-)
--
Mahesh T. Pai http://paivakil.port5.com
Half knowledge is worse than ignorance.
--Thomas B. Macaulay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Colin Percival wrote:
My website, as an original creative work, is covered by copyright
laws and treaties. I did not give permission for my website to be
copied and redistributed.
I'll remove/patch it asap. I'm sorry if I did insult your intelectual
property with this teeny-weeny readme-file.
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Colin Percival wrote:
I don't think I need to explain the problem any further...
Nevertheless, maybe you can give me a hint why you obviously don't want
the text to be part of bsdiff?
I don't like having my work copied without my permission; the fact that
it is a
Colin Percival wrote:
If you had bothered to ask for permission, there's a good chance that I
would have given it, but copying without even asking for permission is
simply Not Acceptable.
Ack, and as I said, I'm sorry for that, it is my fault. However, do you
insist on removing the text, or do
Ok. My knowledge of how Debian does things is rather limited (I don't
use Debian), so I emailed the most obvious contact. In FreeBSD committers
are allowed to touch each other's code, so I assumed that anyone here
would be able to fix the problem. :-)
Unfortuantly we here at Debian don't
Hi
While doing a bit of work in the NEW queue Ive seen stuff using the PHP
license (exact version doesnt matter, they differ from package to
package, take http://www.php.net/license/2_02.txt or
http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt as examples).
(3.0 in this case taken).
It starts like a random
(Also replying to bug page debian-legal (d-l: please CC me on any replies))
Personally from what I have gathered:
* If texi2html has released the singular images under a special
agreement (from which it seems), then maybe the images should be
released dual-licensed (under GPL CC), of course
Scripsit Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt as examples).
3. and 4. are IMO highly questionable if not directly non-free.
With 4 you dont seem to be allowed to call it php if there is a
diff.gz... And now try to use that point on a php-foo package.
I agree.
Himi name its Gianfranco Lutjens, and Im from
Chile.I need to know if you ever received the password for the toolbox E4
for matlab. I need it to make a time series analisys very soon. If you got it,
please, sent me.greatinf from Chile
Gianfranco
13 matches
Mail list logo
