On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:37:17PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Simos Xenitellis:
The StixFonts project started 10 years ago by several publishing houses
of academic journals,
with the aim to create fonts for mathmetical publications.
These fonts, StixFonts, are nearing completion
Hope to have answered to your question. I am sorry but I did not succeedin asking Berkeley's Regents for a license change.
Didn't they issue a blanket license change for _all_ code owned by them under the old bsd license?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 10:37:17PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
| The Font Software may not be modified or altered in any way, except
| that: (a) the Fonts may be converted from one format to another
| (e.g., from TrueType to Postscript), in which case the normal and
| reasonable distortion
* Sven Luther:
Clearly non-free.
I can understand why people think that such a clause is a technical
necessity (reproducible layout), but it still violates DFSG clause 3.
What about a clause mandating that the layout size or whatever it is called,
remains the same for existing fonts ?
I
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Sven Luther:
Clearly non-free.
I can understand why people think that such a clause is a technical
necessity (reproducible layout), but it still violates DFSG clause 3.
What about a clause mandating that the layout size or whatever it is called,
remains the
* Simos Xenitellis:
In materialising this into a concrete suggestion, do you guys suggest
something like:
Change
3. The Font Software may not be modified or altered in any way, except
that: (a) the Fonts may be converted from one format to another (e.g.,
from TrueType to Postscript), in
6 matches
Mail list logo
