=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Pinheiro?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking about copyright details with a friend of mine a few
minutes ago and he presented me the following scenario:
Amazon has millions of book covers in their database [...]
I'm happy that you regard debian-legal highly enough to
Hello, please Cc: me on replies,
The opensc package includes rsaref headers [0] from RSA. The RSA disclaimer has
been
added in a new upstream version [1] and should be included in a next Debian
opensc package.
The RSA disclaimer is [2]:
Regarding the header / include files:
License to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The opensc package includes rsaref headers [0] from RSA. [...]
- is this licence DFSG compliant? I would say yes but the (re)distribution
right
is not explicitely given.
- is this licence GPL compatible? I would say no since it has the same problem
than the
I'm a project admin for MegaMek[1], a SourceForge project that allows
players to play BattleTech[2] (a popular boardgame whose IP is owned by
WizKids LLC.[3]) online. The code is written in Java, and the GNU
Classpath community is rapidly approaching completion of the APIs that
the project uses.
@ 26/09/2005 17:31 : wrote Francesco Poli :
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:33:25 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 26 septembre 2005 à 12:09 -0300, Humberto Massa a écrit
:
2. The person making the modifications must be
identified.
Yellow alert -- dissident test. Marco
@ 26/09/2005 18:39 : wrote Jacobo Tarrio :
El lunes, 26 de septiembre de 2005 a las 19:34:00 +0200, Claus
Färber escribía:
a. place your modifications in the Public Domain or
otherwise make them Freely Available, for example by
allowing the Copyright Holder to include your
James Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
I'm fairly confident that my project does not infringe on the copyrights
of the boardgame authors, given my reading of the US code[4], [...]
I agree with you. I think others might not (mise en scene and all
that), so I leave it for them to suggest
On 9/27/05, James Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem lies in the realm of Copyright and Trademark.
I'd be tempted to use mecha instead of mech. Mecha
has a strongly established generic use tradition.
--
Raul
This is a closed list. That is, if you are not on the list, you cannot post
to it. If you would like to be on the list, please mail geovrml-request at
ai dot sri dot com, with the word subscribe in the subject or body. (You'll
have to de-spam-proof that addy, of course.)
Your post has been
2. The person making the modifications must be identified.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Fails the dissident test, but there's some level of disagreement over
whether that matters.
Doesn't it depend on the meaning of identified? We accept such licenses if
arbitrary pseudonyms are
Fred Fish and Daniel Kegel included specific license text in
their contributions that limit use to Personal, Noncommercial.
Dan Kegel's pretty easy to find in the free software world; if you ask him he
may be willing to relicense under the same license everyone else on the
project uses.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
