On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Patrick Herzig wrote:
FYI, Here's the full text:
[...]
http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:aaX81KBybOIJ:blog.kickino.org/+gfdl+compatible+license+savannahhl=engl=usct=clnkcd=2
is the google cache,
http://rzlab.ucr.edu/debian/savannah_gnu_org_policy.html is a mirror
of it
Glenn Maynard wrote:
But that's a special case; more generally, I don't see any way at all
of satisfying this for the voicemail, toll booth, etc. cases.
(Though the thought of someone corking up a toll booth lane on a busy
interstate to plug in a USB pen drive and download its source is
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:07:08AM +, Gervase Markham wrote:
Glenn Maynard wrote:
But that's a special case; more generally, I don't see any way at all
of satisfying this for the voicemail, toll booth, etc. cases.
(Though the thought of someone corking up a toll booth lane on a busy
Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just that there has been a period when most debian-legal contributors
were extremists or outright loons like you, and in this period while
other developers were not looking these people found a consensus to
change what until then was the widely accepted meaning
On 10553 March 1977, Charles Fry wrote:
Once again, I repeat my claim: that the 3.01 version of the PHP License
is equally fit for licensing PHP itself and PHP Group software. This
claim has been upheld over months of sporadic discussion on the matter
at debian-legal.
So lets look at that
Hmm, it seems this was a bit premature. The Savannah admin who was
looking at my project registration wrote to me:
quote
The decision about the licenses of the project documentations was a bit
prematurate and concerned discussions are in progress.
So nothing has changed until now. If you are
Raul Miller wrote:
Any dispute arising out of or
related to this Agreement shall be brought in the courts of Santa
Clara County, California, USA.
The big deal here is that if someone sues Adobe, Adobe
doesn't have to incur huge legal fees defending themselves.
Since it's free software, why
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:45:52 -0500 Charles Fry wrote:
severity 332606 important
[...]
retitle 331418 'please update the license text'
thanks
Hi,
For all current RC bugs in Pear packages that use the PHP License, I
am downgrading the severity to important, and requesting that
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:21:44PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
If that is were actually what they wrote, I think a lot more people here
would be willing to accept it. E.g, they could have said:
Any dispute arising out of or related to this Agreement
shall be brought in the
9 matches
Mail list logo
