Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] I refer
to Policy on a regular basis, but I don't think I've read the devref since I
went through the NM queue. [...]
Then, as you know, Policy contains the instruction:
'When in doubt about a copyright, send mail to debian-legal@lists.debian.org'
and
Max Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006/5/23, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry if that's butchery of a foreign language, but this list is usually
in English.
Ah ah! This is in english too (there are many universal juridical latin ter=
ms!):
Latin is not English. Is it universal? I don't
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Ciuca, Josephine wrote:
I just wanted to let you know about a GPL violation in the
distribution miniVDR, a distribution based on Depian with so-called
GPL licensed patches (www.minivdr.de). They refuse to share the
sources and are willing to give them only for 15euros,
On 5/19/06, Andrew Donnellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max, did you know that Debian requires *everything*, not just
software, to be DFSG-free? Not that it's particularly relevant since
there isn't a huge amount under the Against DRM license, but...
I have not been able to figure out what Max
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:27:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
complaining that no one shopped the license around to -legal before the
upload (which no one ever has an obligation to do) isn't...
The Debian developer reference states in section 5.1. New packages
the process to add new packages
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:54:13PM -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:27:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
complaining that no one shopped the license around to -legal before the
upload (which no one ever has an obligation to do) isn't...
The Debian developer reference
On Tue, 23 May 2006 15:15:32 +1200 Adam Warner wrote:
Hi all,
[several comments]
Some more press coverage:
Article by Gavin Clarke:
Red Hat: Java Linux license does not go far enough
18 May 2006
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2006/05/18/red_hat_sun_java_license/
Brian Stevens, Red Hat CTO,
2006/5/24, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Max Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006/5/23, MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry if that's butchery of a foreign language, but this list is usually
in English.
Ah ah! This is in english too (there are many universal juridical latin ter=
ms!):
Latin is not
Max Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I said that many latin *juridical* terms are universal: the problem is
that you don't know the language of the *right*
No, the problem is that you seem to be using a foreign language
to cloud matters which are really very simple. [...]
You are closed in your little
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:58:08PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:14:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:18:44PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
myself examined the license
On 5/22/06, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
The questions asked weren't Is this okay for non-free? it's Did you
mean or when you wrote ?. The answers to those latter
questions are, ttbomk, all included in the FAQ, which is why ignoring
it just wastes everyone's time.
* Anthony Towns (aj@azure.humbug.org.au) wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:14:51PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 04:18:44PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
Anyway, the background is that James Troup, Jeroen van Wolffelaar and
myself examined the license before accepting
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060524 17:54]:
So I guess you can still criticize folks for this if you want to, but I know
that my own ongoing notion of best practices comes from stuff I learned
long ago plus new ideas discussed on this mailing list, not from the devref.
Well, wouldn't
13 matches
Mail list logo
