Hi Frank (and all others),
thanks for the clarifications!
Frank Küster wrote:
An earlier version of the package is already in Debian
and it also contains the file Manual.texi with the same
copyright information, but the file was only in the
source package while the new version now contains a
Andreas Fester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
have it relicensed.
... which means that the upstream author has to *replace* the
questionable section with a reference to, for example, the GPL,
right?
There needs to be a statement in each copyrighted file stating the
license granted to the
Andreas Fester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, you have to remove it from the orig.tar.gz, or...
- Anything else?
have it relicensed.
... which means that the upstream author has to *replace* the
questionable section with a reference to, for example, the GPL,
right?
Well, a signed
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mean, this could be difficult, at least when generated files come
into play...
Generated files are, by definition, not the source code of the work;
in the case of the GPL, they are not the preferred form of the work
for making modifications to it. Some
Hi debian-legal,
Could this go in contrib?
http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/index-en.html
The code itself if GPL but it downloads and uses proprietary MS stuff. Seems
like contrib would be ok but I wanted to check with you in case I was missing
something.
Thanks,
--
Matt Taggart
[EMAIL
5 matches
Mail list logo
