George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The venue could make significant difference here, because the licensor could
be terribly wrong in one jurisdiction and correct in another.
That's a problem with choice of law, not choice of venue.
Furthermore you can hadly measure whether the licensor
Hi again,
Upstream has agreed to add a license file to the tgz archive:
This program is totally free and public domain. Do what you want to do with
the source code. If you want, just give me some credits (Michel Louvet) if you
port the game on another platform or use part of the source code.
Seems to be.
In my previous reply I was actually assuming you had that info in
writing, not just an email. But this seems to be OK.
On 8/10/06, Miriam Ruiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
Upstream has agreed to add a license file to the tgz archive:
This program is totally free and
So, I have big news and a big question.
Big news
Creative Commons has announced the public draft of the next version of
their license suite:
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/6017
The changes from the 2.x version are largely due to an effort to make
the licenses compatible with
Evan Prodromou wrote:
Creative Commons has announced the public draft of the next version of
their license suite:
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/6017
Big question
The main question I want to ask debian-legal is this:
Does the anti-DRM requirement
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main question I want to ask debian-legal is this:
Does the anti-DRM requirement in the CCPL 3.0 draft, without a
parallel distribution proviso, make it incompatible with the
DFSG?
I see no reason to believe that the DFSG forbids such a clause.
On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 11:26 -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
GR 2006-01 says, in part,
I accidentally quoted a section from an option of the GR that didn't
pass. Sorry about that. I don't think the mistake invalidates the
discussion, but I wanted to point it out.
~Evan
--
Evan Prodromou [EMAIL
1. Was GR 2006-01 an exception to the DFSG, or a clarification of
our principles?
Consider an analogy. An amusement park ride puts up a sign saying that
kids must be 4 feet tall to enter. A little while later, it declares that
kids must be allowed in if they're 47 inches, and
8 matches
Mail list logo
