Re: Hypocrisy of Debian (was: Sorry, no more RC bugs for non-free data in main ...)

2006-09-05 Thread Andreas Barth
* Markus Laire ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060830 15:01]: I have somewhat similar feelings after I found out that the cdrtools-package[1] included in Debian isn't DFSG-free, but is still included in main. (Even worse, its license might even be illegal because it's GPLv2 + incombatible

Re: Use of the BTS for freeness/redistributability bugs

2006-09-05 Thread Raul Miller
On 9/2/06, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: Scanning through the RC bug list and there seem to be a lot of bugs of the form foo is unsuitable for main because xyzzy license is non-free and foo cannot be redistributed because of barbazquux. I'm inclined to think there should be a

Re: Use of the BTS for freeness/redistributability bugs

2006-09-05 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Raul Miller wrote: On 9/2/06, Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: Scanning through the RC bug list and there seem to be a lot of bugs of the form foo is unsuitable for main because xyzzy license is non-free and foo cannot be redistributed because of barbazquux.