Le vendredi 15 septembre 2006 à 23:51 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We do
no longer return schily author ID, etc.
You no longer return schily, but it seems that noone is allowed to
create a modified version of cdrkit that
Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
Background:
ECW is a prioprietary (patented) compressed image format quite used in
GIS applications. Ermapper recently released its SDK under a multi-license
here included.
It would be nice distributing under non-free at least some programs with
ecw
MJ Ray wrote:
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-August/003876.html
[...]
The main motivation was to prevent license complication,
*not* to prohibit parallel distribution.
This is emphasized quite clearly in that message.
If they
Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi!
Did anyone read Creative Commons response to comments on CC-v3 draft(s)?
A PDF file was sent to the cc-licenses mailing list and can be found
here:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-September/004027.html
Easier to find:
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:43:39 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 15 septembre 2006 à 23:51 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We
do no longer return schily author ID, etc.
You no longer return schily, but it seems that
Eric Lavarde - Debian [Fri Sep 22, 2006 at 01:52:43PM +0200]:
Hello again,
Last tentative: what's wrong with my request that I don't get _any_ answer?
You did get an answer - check message from Joe Smith [Thu Sep 14, 2006
at 02:05:13PM -0400].
I agree with Joe, and believe that a CDDL
6 matches
Mail list logo