On Fri, 06 Apr 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
This tells that *swiftfox*binaries* are not distributable, not the
binaries we would obtain building from sources.
Until you get to section 3:
3. Source code only is licensed MPL as required by
mozilla.org http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.txt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:52:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:57:25PM -0400, Michael Pobega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:03:20AM -0500, Kilz _ wrote:
Hi Debian legal I am writing you to ask a
Gervase Markham wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
I had been using the GPL for some years without fully understanding
its implications. Recently, I spent some time thinking about my
ethical beliefs regarding free software and discovered that I prefer
something like Creative Commons' by-sa
Hello,
perchange I came across this web page:
http://www.hinner.de/linux/
I was surprised that he uses the Official Logo instead of the Open
Logo, and wrote to him about it, stating that my reading of this web
page
http://www.debian.org/logos/
and his web pages should generally not
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:50:20PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
perchange I came across this web page:
http://www.hinner.de/linux/
I was surprised that he uses the Official Logo instead of the Open
Logo, and wrote to him about it, stating that my reading of this web
page
I don't know if this makes any difference, but here's a quote and link for you.
From http://getswiftfox.com/source.htm
[...] Yes, that makes Swiftfox non-free in the Debian sense but it
will always be free of charge to all users. If anyone has a better
solution I would be glad to hear it.
Dusty Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know if this makes any difference, but here's a quote and
link for you.
From http://getswiftfox.com/source.htm
[...] Yes, that makes Swiftfox non-free in the Debian sense but it
will always be free of charge to all users. If anyone has a better
7 matches
Mail list logo
