Re: Request for suggestions of DFSG-free documentation licences

2007-05-27 Thread Ben Finney
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The GPL also requires that any derivative work that one distributes must be licensed under the GPL terms. This is incompatible with taking part of a work under a different license and combining it with the GPL work to distribute. This is true only, of

Re: Bug #383316: Derivative works for songs

2007-05-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 27 May 2007 10:21:26 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: Matthew Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: what if the recording was of actual people playing actual instruments? You know, like people always used to. How to you generate that from 'source' at build time? what _is_ the source? The

Re: Please vet this modified CC license for uploading FoF music to non-free

2007-05-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 27 May 2007 14:59:49 +1000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/27/07, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2007 15:31:21 -0400 Jason Spiro wrote: [...] So, I took http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode and made some changes. Do you have

Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project

2007-05-27 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 27 May 2007 02:43:41 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] Whatever the its origin is[1], the term proprietary is now a well-established[2] word used as opposed to free (as in freedom). And no, it's not a well-established word in that regard.

Re: help with crafting proper license header for a dual-licensing project

2007-05-27 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2007 02:43:41 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote: On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] Whatever the its origin is[1], the term proprietary is now a well-established[2] word used as opposed to free (as in freedom). And no,