Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> You continually miss the point that the GPL is explicitly noted as a
>> free license, which means that anything in the GPL is DFSG free.
>
> No. It means that works licensed under the GPL are considered free
> s
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Armstrong
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> On Tue, 03 Jul 2007, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>>> Sklyarov did what he did AT HOME IN RUSSIA. It was the company he worked
>>> for that marketed it in America.
>>
>> An
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Trying again anyway, since when I don't get answers from anywhere, I can't
work on it freely, so I won't work on it at all and it perhaps won't ever get
packaged for Debian. Vicious circle...
Is this thing (or any license
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Don Armstrong
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007, Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
Sklyarov did what he did AT HOME IN RUSSIA. It was the company he worked
for that marketed it in America.
And Sklyarov who traveled to the US and (at the time) allegedly bro
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 schrieb Nic Suzor:
> On 7/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is this thing (or any license in general, if that could be more easily
> > answered) somehow mixable with the GPL? Eg. that I publish my derived
> > work under the GPL and make an exception for
On 7/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this thing (or any license in general, if that could be more easily
answered) somehow mixable with the GPL? Eg. that I publish my derived work
under the GPL and make an exception for Strategy First to grant them what
they want?
The licenc
Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trying again anyway, since when I don't get answers from anywhere
You could try a lawyer. After all, as is pointed out frequently, this
list is largely comprised of people unqualified to offer legal advice.
--
\ "I know you believe you understo
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2007 schrieb Joe Smith:
> "Ben Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This is not Debian related, but I think you are the ones who know
> >> best about licensing issues.
> >
> > This list, deb
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You continually miss the point that the GPL is explicitly noted as a
> free license, which means that anything in the GPL is DFSG free.
No. It means that works licensed under the GPL are considered free
software under the DFSG. That does *not* mean that
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:50:18AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > I think you are talking about clause 3b of GPLv2, aren't you?
> >
> > Maybe you picked the wrong example, because clause 3b *is* a non-free
> > restriction. Fortunately there's another alternative option,
> > represented by clause
10 matches
Mail list logo
