Dear All,
The licensing of dcraw has recently changed:
A clause concerning the mandatory distribution of source code has been
modified with the following footnote added:
If you have not modified dcraw.c in any way, a link to my
homepage qualifies as full source code.
To me, this seems *less*
Package: dcraw
Version: 7.02-1
Severity: serious
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
However I would appreciate it if the assembled masses of legal
experts could confirm that they agree that this is the case.
There's actually an even more fundamental problem with dcraw.c:
/*
dcraw.c --
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007, Steve King wrote:
The license against which you have raised a bug is not the one that covers
the version that is currently part of debian. The appropriate license is
here:
Right, but the issues present in the current version of the license
are also present in the
On 11071 March 1977, Steve King wrote:
If you have not modified dcraw.c in any way, a link to my
homepage qualifies as full source code.
Thats ok.
--
bye Joerg
(13:24) Aquariophile ist iptables eigentlich nur ein tool zum
verhindern von aussenkonnecti,erungen auf gewissen ports oder
4 matches
Mail list logo
