Hi all,
I intended to do a qa upload to fix some bugs on the package
mined [0] which is orphaned[1], and i got a lintian warning about
the file debian/copyright where it has no copyright holder,
when i asked to the upstream maintainer of this issue he answered me this [2]
also i asked in
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra clarifications
and permissions. [...]
Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L. licence
will contaminate other software and so fail DFSG 9. Also, I think the
licence
Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
distribution of Scripts, that is to say, works written in your
programming language.
[...]
There's even the question of how
Hi,
Am Di 25 Mär 2008 03:07:24 CET
schrieb Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I intended to do a qa upload to fix some bugs on the package
mined [0] which is orphaned[1], and i got a lintian warning about
the file debian/copyright where it has no copyright holder,
when i asked to the upstream
Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I intended to do a qa upload to fix some bugs on the package mined
[0] which is orphaned[1], and i got a lintian warning about the file
debian/copyright where it has no copyright holder,
Rather, that the copyright holder is not identified.
when i asked
Hi All,
I got a reply to the post on comp.os.minix about mined:
---
Jan-Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remember Michiel writing it. In the Netherlands you don't need to
claim copyright, it comes from writing it.
However in this case, Andy payed (100 guilders if I remember correctly)
for mined,
Mauro Lizaur wrote:
I remember Michiel writing it. In the Netherlands you don't need to
claim copyright, it comes from writing it.
However in this case, Andy payed (100 guilders if I remember correctly)
for mined, so that would make it a work for hire.
Please note that work for hire in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Landry wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In example, I can release Falcon as a Debian package under GPL, and
let users pick FPLL if they wish.
That would be perfect. Many other programs in Debian are
dual-licensed in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray wrote:
Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 03:10:07 pm Francesco Poli wrote:
I don't think that copyright laws give you the right to control
distribution of Scripts, that is to say, works written in
your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra
clarifications and permissions. [...]
Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L.
licence will contaminate
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter Landry wrote:
Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In example, I can release Falcon as a Debian package under GPL, and
let users pick FPLL if they wish.
That would be perfect. Many other programs in Debian are
dual-licensed in
11 matches
Mail list logo
