Re: DEP licenses

2008-05-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Dropping Cc on -project, adding To to -legal. If you reply, please maintain the Cc list) Hi debian-legal, On 29/05/08 at 13:54 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:51:33PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: I'm not sure what would be the best practical license for DEPs, so

Re: DEP licenses

2008-05-29 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: The basic requirements are: (AFAIK) - not copylefted, so we can include the document in another document - suitable for documents - require changing title/authorship upon changes (see above) There's really no need to require changing the title, since

Re: DEP licenses

2008-05-29 Thread Ben Finney
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MIT/X11 with minor changes: When recommending, it's best to refer to this as the terms of the Expat license (of which there has only ever been one version), not MIT/X11 license which is a more ambiguous name (several licenses meet that description, not

Re: DEP licenses

2008-05-29 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:12:05 +1000 Ben Finney wrote: Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MIT/X11 with minor changes: When recommending, it's best to refer to this as the terms of the Expat license (of which there has only ever been one version), not MIT/X11 license which is a more