(Dropping Cc on -project, adding To to -legal. If you reply, please
maintain the Cc list)
Hi debian-legal,
On 29/05/08 at 13:54 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:51:33PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I'm not sure what would be the best practical license for DEPs, so
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The basic requirements are: (AFAIK)
- not copylefted, so we can include the document in another document
- suitable for documents
- require changing title/authorship upon changes (see above)
There's really no need to require changing the title, since
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MIT/X11 with minor changes:
When recommending, it's best to refer to this as the terms of the
Expat license (of which there has only ever been one version), not
MIT/X11 license which is a more ambiguous name (several licenses
meet that description, not
On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:12:05 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MIT/X11 with minor changes:
When recommending, it's best to refer to this as the terms of the
Expat license (of which there has only ever been one version), not
MIT/X11 license which is a more
4 matches
Mail list logo