Ian Jackson wrote:
Quoting the license:
...
If you modify the files, you must
- Rename the fonts to remove any reference to Liberation
- Not install the fonts as liberation
- Rename the binary package and the source package
- Change the description to remove all references to Liberation
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And much more importantly, a similar clause (albeit only for the reserved
font name) is present in the Open Font License, under which most of the
free fonts are and which is accepted in Debian main.
The OFL is a bit
Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Ian Jackson wrote:
Quoting the license:
...
If you modify the files, you must
- Rename the fonts to remove any reference to Liberation
- Not install the fonts as liberation
- Rename the binary package and the source package
- Change the description to remove all
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And much more importantly, a similar clause (albeit only for the reserved
font name) is present in the Open Font License, under which most of the
free fonts are and which is accepted in Debian main.
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:22:38 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
Rafael Laboissiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know whether the Unicode Copyright [1] is DFSG-compliant?
When discussing a specific license, it's best to present the text of
the license in the thread for later reference.
5 matches
Mail list logo
