Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.09.2008, 20:13 +0200 schrieb Francesco Poli:
If being usable in an SSH session counts as supporting remote
interaction through a computer network, then basically every program
supports such interaction! This would mean that any AfferoGPLv3'ed
program must comply with
I agree, which is why we chose the AGPLv3 for our project.
I've gotten the impression, though, that many people on this list are
arguing against the AGPL on the basis that they want to retain people's
freedom to exploit the ASP loophole.
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Joachim Breitner [EMAIL
Others have explained why this is not a critical bug in this specific
case. (Although as an aside it seems quite incomprehensible to me
that these projects, and Gnome in general, have effectively thrown
away the source!)
But there was one misunderstanding here which I think is important to
Arc Riley wrote:
I agree, which is why we chose the AGPLv3 for our project.
I've gotten the impression, though, that many people on this list are
arguing against the AGPL on the basis that they want to retain people's
freedom to exploit the ASP loophole.
I've gotten that impression too.
Arc Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've gotten the impression, though, that many people on this list
are arguing against the AGPL on the basis that they want to retain
people's freedom to exploit the ASP loophole.
You're seeing a different discussion from what I'm seeing, then.
The
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008, Arc Riley wrote:
I've gotten the impression, though, that many people on this list are
arguing against the AGPL on the basis that they want to retain people's
freedom to exploit the ASP loophole.
I don't believe anyone here has argued that people exploiting the ASP
6 matches
Mail list logo
