On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
Bad example, but the same warning is on Sainsbury's Shelled Walnuts
300g, which I'm pretty sure are nuts and can be looked up on
http://www.sainsburys.com/groceries/
Consider how hard it would be to have the law say products must contain
warnings about nuts,
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Ken Arromdee wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, MJ Ray wrote:
Bad example, but the same warning is on Sainsbury's Shelled Walnuts
300g, which I'm pretty sure are nuts and can be looked up on
http://www.sainsburys.com/groceries/
Consider how hard it would be to have the law
Dear all
Software in question: GnomeSword
Software licence: GPL v2 or (at your option) any later
The documentation (Gnome Help file) is covered by GFDL 1.1 with no
invariant sections and a disclaimer.[1]
I want to clarify that it still qualifies for the staying in Main. I've googled
a lot
I was hoping to get a clarification on the implications of dual licensing.
Many developers are under the impression that with dual-licensed software
you can choose which license's terms you abide by. Some contend that when
redistributing a project released under, for instance, BSD and LGPL
Dean Landolt d...@deanlandolt.com writes:
I was hoping to get a clarification on the implications of dual
licensing.
There's no canonical definition of the term that I'm aware of.
Many developers are under the impression that with dual-licensed
software you can choose which license's terms
Hi Dimitrij,
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:49 AM, dmitrij.led...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
Software in question: GnomeSword
Software licence: GPL v2 or (at your option) any later
The documentation (Gnome Help file) is covered by GFDL 1.1 with no
invariant sections and a disclaimer.[1]
I
6 matches
Mail list logo