Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com wrote: [...]
In fact the head of Microsoft has said That only Novell and other
people who have signed agreements is protected. So all the class
libraries of mono need to move to the restricted section. Hopefully
this will push the .Net wanting people to get
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM, MJ Raym...@phonecoop.coop wrote:
Peter Dolding oia...@gmail.com wrote: [...]
In fact the head of Microsoft has said That only Novell and other
people who have signed agreements is protected. So all the class
libraries of mono need to move to the restricted
On Mon Jul 06 21:04, Peter Dolding wrote:
What is more worrying here is the progressions of license conversions
it slowly looks like its completely converting to MIT so meaning
Novell will not be blocked by shipping if Patent claims come.
GPLv3 would be the only thing which provided any such
Hello,
I hope that an improving economy is bringing new opportunities for growth to
your firm. If you have unexpected needs for additional headcount or need to
quickly fill a role on a temporary/contract basis, please keep BCI in mind.
In the current market, there are many outstanding
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009, Peter Dolding wrote:
non-free is the section I mean. Items in there have restrictions
that could mean they are non free.
non-free is for things which we can distribute legally but do not meet
the DFSG. Things that are controlled by patents which are actively
enforced for
Hello list,
Who is the appropriate contact for requesting permission to use the
Iceweasel trademark, in a context other than direct reference to the
rebranded Firefox software? I don't see any text in the latest iceweasel
package's copyright file governing usage.
(The intent here is potential
6 matches
Mail list logo
