cristian paul peñaranda rojas p...@kristianpaul.org wrote:
Hello,
I was checking opencascade in lenny was in non-free, but in queeze
is in main-free now :D
So i guess the new license is okay with debian legal and free
sofware, but can anyone in shorts word explainme why please :)
From
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:06:47 -0800 (PST) Walter Landry wrote:
[...]
The license was never really an issue. There was an explanatory note
which contradicted the license and seemed to add non-free terms, but
that is not the license.
As I summarized in
Hello,
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
No, it violates DFSG §3.
So I can do nothing.
Today I have tried to contact the old developer = author with his
old email adress, but I think I get no answer.
Thank you for this effort, it is necessary to try.
Today I have received his
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes:
So there is only on step to do: Move d4x into the non-free archive.
Take care: The fact that a work is non-free does not mean the Debian
project has license to redistribute it in the ‘non-free’ section. Many
works are so non-free that they cannot be
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Ben Finney
ben+deb...@benfinney.id.auben%2bdeb...@benfinney.id.au
wrote:
Joachim Wiedorn ad_deb...@joonet.de writes:
So there is only on step to do: Move d4x into the non-free archive.
Take care: The fact that a work is non-free does not mean the Debian
Hello.
I've noticed a software with a custom licence. Seems to roughly adhere
to DFSG (section 4 and 6 may not...):
http://www.cdsmodel.com/cdsmodel/cds-disclaimer.page
Here's section 6, for instance, which seems the most critical:
6. Indemnity for Use of ISDA CDS Standard Model in
Guillaume Yziquel guillaume.yziq...@citycable.ch writes:
I've noticed a software with a custom licence.
Which software work is that?
Seems to roughly adhere to DFSG (section 4 and 6 may not...):
http://www.cdsmodel.com/cdsmodel/cds-disclaimer.page
For reference in this thread, here is
7 matches
Mail list logo
