Re: Do you consider charity shops non commercial?

2012-04-15 Thread Chris Harshman
On Apr 14, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: The term non-commercial is open to interpretation I was surprised Black's (8e) doesn't define (non-)commercial. The closest it gets is commercial law ... dealing with the sale and distribution of goods, the financing of credit

Re: Do you consider charity shops non commercial?

2012-04-15 Thread MJ Ray
Paul Wise p...@debian.org This is the relevant section of the CC NC licenses: You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation. The exchange of the

Re: Do you consider charity shops non commercial?

2012-04-15 Thread Guilherme de S. Pastore
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 02:44:44AM -0700, Chris Harshman wrote: On Apr 14, 2012, at 5:35 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: The term non-commercial is open to interpretation I was surprised Black's (8e) doesn't define (non-)commercial. Black's (9e) defines commercial use as a use that is

No source code for wesnoth-music

2012-04-15 Thread Evgeny Kapun
Hi, I've found that music tracks for The Battle for Wesnoth (package wesnoth-music in Debian) are only provided as compressed Ogg Vorbis files, without any information used to generate them. I have two questions: * Does wesnoth-music comply with DFSG? I've heard that at certain point DFSG

Re: No source code for wesnoth-music

2012-04-15 Thread Mark Weyer
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 12:08:27AM +0400, Evgeny Kapun wrote: Hi, I've found that music tracks for The Battle for Wesnoth (package wesnoth-music in Debian) are only provided as compressed Ogg Vorbis files, without any information used to generate them. I have two questions: * Does

Re: No source code for wesnoth-music

2012-04-15 Thread Guilherme de Siqueira Pastore
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Mark Weyer wrote: * Does distributing wesnoth-music without source code comply with its license (GPL 2+)? No. The copyright holders can distribute their own work in any way they like, No discussion here... but anybody else breaches the GPL 2 or