Quoting Reinhard Tartler (2013-01-16 07:27:25)
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
I'll setup a mechanism to have libav extend the copyright file for
each binary packages, adding to header section a reasoned effective
license.
...and will start
Hi,
I'm involved in the game Red Eclipse[1], both in Debian and upstream.
We (upstream) were recently discussing including art content (in this
case a sky texture) licensed under the GPL (v2+ or v3 likely). (Yes, GPL
for art content is not a good idea in general, but that's a separate
issue.)
Martin Erik Werner, 2013-01-16 17:15+0100 (gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal):
However, what struck me as a problem here are screenshots, videos, etc.
showing the game and the art content in it. A screenshot showing both a
CC-BY-SA-3.0 texture and a GPL texture would be a derivative work of
both
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Martin Erik Werner
martinerikwer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm involved in the game Red Eclipse[1], both in Debian and upstream.
We (upstream) were recently discussing including art content (in this
case a sky texture) licensed under the GPL (v2+ or
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:37:54 -0800 Vincent Cheng wrote:
Hi Martin,
Hi Martin, hi Vincent,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Martin Erik Werner
martinerikwer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm involved in the game Red Eclipse[1], both in Debian and upstream.
We (upstream) were recently
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
I am not sure. Is it a derivative of the content? I think the question
is the same as: is a picture of a monument a derivative of that
monument? You may want to ask wikipedians about that.
Is it a derivative of the code? I doubt it, I
6 matches
Mail list logo
