William Whyte writes ("Re: Questions about libntru license/ntru patent status"):
> On the FOSS Exception,
> https://github.com/NTRUOpenSourceProject/ntru-crypto/blob/master/FOSS%20Exception.md:
> the intent here is to protect the effectiveness of the GPL. As noted,
> clause 2b requires that "The
Ferenc Kovacs writes ("Re: debian status on using the PHP license for pear/pecl
extensions"):
> Thanks for the reply.
Sorry about the delay replying. This one is more complicated than
most.
> I see that there is no answer for Q4 in your forwarded mail, was that
> originally not answered or
Ben Finney writes ("Re: ad hoc license: is it DFSG-conformant ?"):
> One significant lack is that the permissions do not include explicit
> permission for a recipient to license the work to third parties under
> the same conditions. This fails DFSG ยง3.
Such a sublicensing permission is
Ben Finney writes ("Re: Status of US Government Works in foreign countries"):
> One large problem: I can't see that the above conditions grant freedom
> to redistribute in modified or unmodified form. That fails the DFSG, by
> my reading.
This is not a problem here for the same reason that it is
4 matches
Mail list logo