Paul Wise writes ("Re: Can a license be "DFSG approved"?"):
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:53 PM, David Seaward wrote:
> > I was also reminded of the comment below, and wondered in retrospect if
> > a flagging licenses as "DFSG approved" actually makes sense?
>
> The DFSG is not a body that can
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 14:50 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The DFSG is not a body that can approve things. You could say "DFSG
> compatible", or "foo version X under license Y was approved by the
> Debian ftp-masters".
Thanks for the clarification. Your comment about compatibility matches
a
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:53 PM, David Seaward wrote:
> I suggested DFSG flagging, and SPDX are interested in a machine-
> readable status list. [2] Is there such a thing?
There is not such a thing.
> I was also reminded of the comment below, and wondered in retrospect if
> a flagging licenses
3 matches
Mail list logo
