Re: configure.in is missing but...

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Can't you find a copy of the configure.ac somewhere ? If not, you may > be able to reconstruct one. Skimreading the configure script suggests > that wouldn't be too hard. It looks like the jpeg-6b-steg is a modified embedded code copy of

Re: French gov open license

Ian Jackson writes: > Ben Finney writes ("Re: French gov open license"): > > More precisely, “pass DFSG” is not something we can ask of licenses. > > Rather, the DFSG are for evaluating a *work* proposed for entry to > > Debian. > > […] > > I think this is rather

Re: configure.in is missing but...

Eriberto Mota writes ("configure.in is missing but..."): > In #882538, Helmut pointed that outguess[1] has a configure file[2] > generated by a missing configure.in. He considers that configure, an > interpreted script (shell), has no source code because the following > lines: ... > I still have

configure.in is missing but...

Hi, In #882538, Helmut pointed that outguess[1] has a configure file[2] generated by a missing configure.in. He considers that configure, an interpreted script (shell), has no source code because the following lines: # Generated automatically using autoconf version 2.12 [...] # Any additions