On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:45 AM Paul Jakma wrote:
> There is an issue with the GPL style copyleft of abuse by corporates. In
> particular, abusing the ability to discharge source distribution
> privately, and then using various forms of side-contracts to
> (indirectly) "discourage" recipients
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 18:31, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Or are you really convinced that these other issues are showstoppers
> and that without handling them in your licence, downstreams will abuse
> their position ? Frankly that doesn't seem particularly likely.
This library implements a
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
Or are you really convinced that these other issues are showstoppers
and that without handling them in your licence, downstreams will abuse
their position ? Frankly that doesn't seem particularly likely.
Without denigrating what you're saying on
Giacomo Tesio writes ("Re: Hacking License"):
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 17:29, Ian Jackson
> > I think Giacomo would be well served by adopting AGPLv3+ and
> > nominating himself as licence steward.
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> Unfortunately AGPLv3 doesn't cover many of the issues I try to
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 17:29, Ian Jackson
wrote:
>
> Xavier writes ("Re: Hacking License"):
> > No Debian accepts any license that are DFSG compliant (DFSG is just a
> > guidelines). You may use the 3 tests to understand what may be wrong :
>
> These tests are not official. AFAIAA they do not
Xavier writes ("Re: Hacking License"):
> No Debian accepts any license that are DFSG compliant (DFSG is just a
> guidelines). You may use the 3 tests to understand what may be wrong :
These tests are not official. AFAIAA they do not form part of the
approval process used by the Debian ftpmasters
6 matches
Mail list logo
