> You didn't answer my question:
>
> | [The bug] says that firefox-esr only downloads this proprietary
> | software after explicit user action. Is that right ?
I'd say, no that's not right. User action is required, but that action doesn't
explicitly request that additional software be
Nat Tuck writes ("Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module"):
> The binary-only wildvine component of Firefox, as incorporated in
> the package currently shipped by Debian, can not reasonably be
> understood as an "optional addon that is downloaded separately in
> response to an explicit user
Is this an issue relating to the software license, or just to the general
spirit of the DFSG?
It would be nice if the rating system could be opt-in, warning based, easy
to opt out of, etc. But as long as the software is Free, users can
recompile it without the rating system... The point being
Hello,
In discussion about Content Rating System (CRS) implementation in debian-devel
mailing list, Gard Spreemann questioned
whether CRS would conflict with DFSG:
Bagas Sanjaya writes:
> Regarding freedom, yes it can be affected by CRS because CRS can limit
freedom to use programs for some
4 matches
Mail list logo
