On July 3, 2019 1:55:04 AM GMT+02:00, Simon McVittie wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Jul 2019 at 15:20:37 -0400, Nat Tuck wrote:
>> It'd probably be necessary to go through the packages in main and see
>> if any other packages download and install proprietary software at
>all,
>> or if this is just Firefox
On Tue, 02 Jul 2019 at 15:20:37 -0400, Nat Tuck wrote:
> It'd probably be necessary to go through the packages in main and see
> if any other packages download and install proprietary software at all,
> or if this is just Firefox even in the more general case.
I want to head this off right now,
My goals in posting were to drum up support, or at least to figure out what
other people think about the issue.
My hope was that people who care about free licensing would be subscribed to
debian-legal, and that at least some people would immediately be interested in
/ worried about the
Nat Tuck writes ("Re: Missing source in firefox-esr: EME module"):
> All that gets a bit off topic for why I started this thread on debian-legal.
> Currently, the Firefox package *logically* bundles this component in a way
> that's clearly intended to dishonestly circumvent the DFSG. Papering
4 matches
Mail list logo
