Re: Re: your mail

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:51:29PM +0100, Anthony Youngman wrote: Sorry, my goof. I shouldn't be sloppy. It's the FSF faq. Is making and using multiple copies within one organization or company distribution? . As I read that, it's simply saying that the you in the FAQ can be a company

Re: Is this software really GPL?

Note: I've left Anthony Youngman's email address in the headers, but I seem to have a local problem where email to Anthony bounces. [I can work around that, using telnet, but it's a pain.] quote I strongly suggest that you read the following two web pages:

RE: Is this software really GPL?

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 October 2004 11:09 To: Anthony Youngman Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Is this software really GPL? On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 08:04:31AM +0100, Anthony Youngman wrote: Sorry for lookout mangling my cut-n-paste - this isn't quite a proper reply

[no subject]

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:23:11AM +0100, Anthony Youngman wrote: But as I see it, they (QM) are adding an extra restriction, as proscribed by the GPL (clauses 6 and 7). If you distribute to subsidiaries, you may not stop them distributing to the world. But the GPL explicitly recognises