J.B. Nicholson-Owens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
The litmus test here is a significant amount of functionality, not
will refuse to work at all without it, although that's a fairly
good description of a console without a ROM.
Would one ROM cut it, then? I am working to determine if one ROM is
Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
- one is taken from RFC 3174
(http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3174.html, license terms at the end).
Not a chance, that's nowhere near GPL-compatible.
It also appears to be non-free in its own right.
I don't like the wording of derivative work that
Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003, Joe Drew wrote:
So far as I know, it is not illegal to infringe on somebody else's
patents. AIUI patent holders can enforce (or not) their patents at
will by suing, but doing so is their perogative and no law makes it
wrong for
David Starner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
* That which is in main must be buildable and usable solely with
packages also in main (IOW, main is a closure);
Really? Does that mean that the Windows specific parts of GCC must be
removed from the tarball? Or does it only apply to programs, so if
4 matches
Mail list logo
