CC-BY-SA 2.5 can be re-released under 3.0?

2012-08-18 Thread Fabio
See this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432095 and my reply with links to CC FAQ (sorry for the broken links due to crappy webmail). So would it be possible to just restrict the package license to 3.0 to be debian compatible? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

phpldapadmin 0.9.5, is it free?

2005-01-05 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
which reports the GPL license. I've packaged phpldapadmin and I'm ready-to-upload it, but I'd like your opinion on this issue: can this website influence the freedom of phpldapadmin or it has no meaning? Thanks in advance for your help, Fabio. PS: Please CC, I'm not subscribed to this list

license for patch?

2003-02-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
a lot and best regards Fabio PS: CC me on replies. Im not subscribed (yet) to this mailing list -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+ShgXhCzbekR3nhgRApCJAKCPLPoGfI0SQuF5Vics1x5Q7520gQCcD4oN IwobHtK47SpAWgVY4n+Ctq0= =na+t -END PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: license for patch?

2003-02-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Henning Makholm wrote: Scripsit Fabio Massimo Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually the author of the patch did not put any license on it and he belives that he cannot due to german laws. He is cooperating with us 100