On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:27:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> What really annoys me about this whole situation is this: I think no
> one presently argues that the GPLv2 prevents people from distributing
> pre-built binaries for proprietary operating systems. I can take
> Hotspot (a component
Hi,
debian-edu-doc is a gpl2+ document, which is translated into several
languages. Now Petter had the idea to feed this into google translations,
using http://freetranslation.mobi and committed the results back into the
debian-edu-doc svn repository.
h01ger pere_away, what does semiautomatic
Hi,
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 23:55, Francesco Poli wrote:
and that was a clearly DFSG-free choice.
I'm personally very happy with that choice and feel it's a perfectly
adequate license for videos.
I dont. First it speaks about software not videos or media. Second, I
don't like the naming
Hi,
you might have got this email because I bcc:ed you because you gave a talk at
FOSDEM or operated the video camera there.
I would like to inform you about a licence change I propose for those and
other videos, and am highly interesting in your thoughts about this.
Before FOSDEM, all videos
Hi,
forwarding a thread from debian-www@
On Wednesday 12 October 2005 15:31, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:54:39PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw a version of the Debian Logo being used for a corporate logo,
although rotated its the same. I don't know what reservations
Hi debian-legal, hi fai :-)
On Friday 05 August 2005 17:29, Geert Stappers wrote:
| Under the following conditions:
| by
| Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the
| author or licensor.
Sounds reasonable to me.
unfortunatly not be me: i hereby request you to
6 matches
Mail list logo
