hi,
the AGPL3 is the GPL3 with an additional clause. is there some reason
why an AGPL2 wouldn't be possible?
the AGPL3 is nice, but isn't compatible with GPLv2 only code, so an
AGPL2 would be usable in places the AGPL3 can't be.
if an AGPL2-like license would be possible, how hard would it
hi,
i've just packaged and submitted the r-cran-afex package, and it has
been accepted
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797819
but now i'm wondering if it doesn't violate the GPL2.
it is released under GPL3+, but it has dependencies which are GPL2
r-cran-afex and its
hi ian,
On 30/09/2015 2:58 pm, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jonathon Love writes ("r-cran-afex package, violates the GPL?"):
>> i've just packaged and submitted the r-cran-afex package, and it has
>> been accepted
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
3 matches
Mail list logo