Re: Determining Intention for Licensing

Hello Riley, On 25-07-14 05:20, Riley Baird wrote: Hello debian-legal! I am currently packaging GMastermind, and I have run into a licensing issue. In the package, every source file that has a license header is released under GPL-2, with the or, at your option, any later version statement.

Re: local w3c copies for saxonhe and saxonb

://dev.saxonica.com/repos/archive/opensource/latest9.4/data/w3c/ I think most of these files are already in the w3c-dtd-xhtml package, have you looked at that? Regards, Kuno Woudt. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Re: licensing question for nom.tam.fits

Hello, On 11/30/2012 02:01 PM, Florian Rothmaier wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Francesco, fortunately, the upstream author Thomas MyGlynn made a new release for which he added a statement that the code is in the public domain. In my debian package which can be

Re: Linux and GPLv2

On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 03:30:28PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And probably it will also deal with running the code on a publicly accessible server. The question is if a license based on copyright can legally place such restrictions on use of