Dann wrote:
Thank you for your offer. I think a relicensing would be the cleanest
approach.
Note that I am a Debian Developer, but I do not speak for the db
packaging, release, or legal teams. I hope that they'll jump in if
they are in disagreement with any of the statements I've made
Thanks, Dan. I appreciate your following up. I'm including
the Debian team on this email, in the hope that I can help
to drive everyone to agreement on the point at last. I don't
have an email address for Dave Turner, so would be grateful
if you'd pass this along to him. I've included the
All,
I'm following up on a thread that's a month or so old, now. My
apologies for the delay in closing this out.
I was unsuccessful in getting the Commons folks to work with the FSF
on a GPL-compatible commons deed. While I believe that such a deed
would be in the interest of the community
I've got a follow-up question for the Debian readership on the list:
What documentation licenses do you know of that are DFSG-free?
How do you guys think about marks, and preservation of trademark
rights in documentation?
mike
4 matches
Mail list logo
