On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:38:48PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Joe Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. the Chinese Dissident.
It has been suggested that this test be referred to as simply as the
Dissident test.
But the suggestion has not been taken. The point isn't to
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:33:51AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:52:57PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
That sounds ludicrous and farfetched to me, given that both statements, by
themselves, are already farfetched in this circumstance.
Well, it certainly seems
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:06:55PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:45:25AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Unfortunately, it turns out that the UWash lawyers were right about
the way these clauses are understood by the courts; it sucks, but
there it is. They
3 matches
Mail list logo
