could be
illegal to download?
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot
today. /usr/games/fortune
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
requests your first born child.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Datei nicht gefunden Fehler 404
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
” is not
a useful descriptor for a copyright holder.
Isn't the word Copyright already enough, and therefore the '(c)' just
redundant but not relevant for the case ?
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
~
The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.Unknown
signature.asc
Description: Digital
that I don't see the problem.
Do you have any hint that this confirmation could be flawed?
regards,
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/703305
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
remove Sam's
name and put the name of who is licensing: and changing it is allowed as
long as the name is changed.
License, as I read it, has no copyright for itself, which sounds pretty
logical given its spirit :)
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Q: Why
idea.
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been. -- Mark Twain»
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
to something DFSG-compatible ;-)
Unfortunately this makes things even worse and therefore such theme shall
not enter main.
thanks all for your answers,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Another good night not to sleep in a eucalyptus tree.»
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«You will be advanced socially, without any special effort on your
part.»
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:52:22 -0700
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:07:17AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
Whether a GPLv3 work is distributable compliant with Debian's own DFSG
is a different matter -- and if the answer is no, that doesn't make
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:42:03 +1000
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it legal to upload a package with GPLv3 license right now?
It's always legal to upload it anywhere, because the license gives you
the permission to do that (provided you
Hi,
Just a simple question which the previous threads about GPLv3 didn't solve
for me or I was unable to see the answer, anyway:
Is it legal to upload a package with GPLv3 license right now?
thanks in advance,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Good day to deal
11 matches
Mail list logo
