Re: Bug#223961: libdvdread3: makes download of possibly illegal libdvdcss too easy

, but legal in ZZZ, Debian will not include XXX? Shouldn't it be better (in theory), that if package XXX will be excluded from servers in country YYY, but still be available on server in ZZZ? -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: solution to GFDL and DSFG problem

Branded wrote: I will both consent and interests of users and unoriginal. You Да, Бранден, отличился :) Интересно, что бы ты делал, если большинство разработчиков Дебиана были русскими? ;) -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

(for example Manifesto from Emacs), they can agree with invariant sections in documenation. I believe in most cases we can agree with such a limitation. -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

law. GPL lifts some limits to restrict users. So does FDL. -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

of the package interact with license stipulations. -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?

of the above statements approximates my opinion. Part 2. Status of Respondent Please mark with an X the following item only if it is true. [ ] I am a Debian Developer as described in the Debian Constitution as of the date on this survey. === CUT HERE === -- Best regards, Sergey

Re: A possible approach in solving the FDL problem

Peter S Galbraith wrote: The GPL takes away the freedom to redistribute works as closed sources or unmodifiable. But it enforces the freedoms we want. It protects the This is what I name deal. You claim to resist it, because your cow will be disappointed. -- Best regards, Sergey

Re: A possible approach in solving the FDL problem

if it becomes out of date. -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible approach in solving the FDL problem

, but it's very possible to do so... Thank you Wouter. -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible approach in solving the FDL problem

at the time DFSG was created (or one definition was just missed). 2. New license which depends on differnce between software and documentation appears. -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible approach in solving the FDL problem

want Debian to move FDL to non-free at the same time want Debian to distribute non-free stuff. Is it accidental? -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible approach in solving the FDL problem

MJ Ray wrote: FDL supporters: how a license which forbids to put the document on an encrypted filesystem can be considered free? How a license which forbids Is it? Are you sure? Or do you plan to distribute encrypted Debian CD's? This is a question which has been asked of FSF, as it