Re: flattr this images

and not include such files at all? i think i'll go for the text solution for the time being, but if the images are really not copyrightable, including them would enhance recognizability of flattr links and spare us potential discussions with upstream. regards chrysn [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/w

flattr this images

. create free flattr this buttons. same implications as 4., but more work; might be upstreamable, though. if someone wants to take up the mass bug filing suggested by paul in [1], i suggest we first come up with a solution. best regards chrysn [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/03/msg00054

[hugh.m.bri...@gmail.com: fixing openscad license issues with OGL_helper.h]

has done is sufficient to get us out of the license mess? - Forwarded message from Don Bright hugh.m.bri...@gmail.com - Dear Chrysn I have re-implemented OGL_helper.h using different code. I rewrote the whole thing. It was a 'dirty room' implementation though, not clean room. The code

need help with openscad's license

out, or have other suggestions on how to solve that? regards chrysn -- I shouldn't have written all those tank programs. -- Kevin Flynn Format: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?revision=174 Upstream-Name: opencsg Source: http://opencsg.org/ Files: * Copyright: © 2009

Re: need help with openscad's license

exactly the wording recommended for a qpl exception by the fsf[1]. the note on dropping it seems to be a good idea in case some new library needs an exception, thanks for your input chrysn [1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#QPL -- To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely