Le dimanche 24 septembre 2006 à 23:32 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Jörg Schilling interprets this restriction as implied by trademark law
in his country.
I don't know whether his interpretation is a legally valid one (IANAL),
even though I've heard of cases where courts prevented the
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 24 septembre 2006 à 23:32 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
snip
Replacing the text by a 'this software cannot return
schily because it would infringe on Jörg Schilling's trademark'
notice - or no notice at all - would seem like a fine solution.
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:49:35 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le dimanche 24 septembre 2006 à 23:32 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
[...]
Here, the restriction clearly forbids creating a derivative work
that is a drop-in replacement of the original, and thus interferes
with interoperability.
Le vendredi 15 septembre 2006 à 23:51 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We do
no longer return schily author ID, etc.
You no longer return schily, but it seems that noone is allowed to
create a modified version of cdrkit that
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:43:39 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 15 septembre 2006 à 23:51 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We
do no longer return schily author ID, etc.
You no longer return schily, but it seems that
On 9/16/06, Markus Laire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just reported a bug for this. Hopefully I didn't make any mistakes
and it'll eventually show up in bugs.debian.org
It's bug #387783
At http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=387783
--
Markus Laire
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...] It only implies that this issue is
higly inflamable, and putting it on a wider mailing list is not a good
tactical move. And please don't tell me that there is not a single troll
on this list.
Given the apparent posting restrictions on debburn-devel, I can
On 9/15/06, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/06, Markus Laire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, it's possible that I should report a serious[1] bug for this,
but I wanted to ask about this from debian-legal first, to know if
others agree that this is a problem.
Reporting a
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to ask you to give us some days to find a peacefull
solution without starting another flamewar. But, hey, you already did it
by Cc'ing debian-legal and so attracting the trolls ASAP. Very
diplomatic. NOT.
If the above troll of debian-legal by
#include hallo.h
* MJ Ray [Fri, Sep 15 2006, 10:53:03PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to ask you to give us some days to find a peacefull
solution without starting another flamewar. But, hey, you already did it
by Cc'ing debian-legal and so attracting the trolls ASAP.
#include hallo.h
* Markus Laire [Thu, Sep 14 2006, 03:37:11PM]:
I mentioned this problem over a week ago[5] at debburn-devel but
didn't get any response.
Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We do no
longer return schily author ID, etc.
Recently Nathanael Nerode
On 9/14/06, Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Markus Laire [Thu, Sep 14 2006, 03:37:11PM]:
I mentioned this problem over a week ago[5] at debburn-devel but
didn't get any response.
Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We do no
longer return
On 9/14/06, Markus Laire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, it's possible that I should report a serious[1] bug for this,
but I wanted to ask about this from debian-legal first, to know if
others agree that this is a problem.
Reporting a serious bug is definitely correct.
Be sure to mention that
13 matches
Mail list logo
